Editorial Standards

Trust is earned through transparency. This page outlines how we gather information, verify claims, and keep Smart Lawn Guide content accurate for lawn-to-garden conversions.

Our process

  1. Plan experiments: Each major article begins with a scoped field test in our Austin, Texas homestead. We log objectives, materials, weather conditions, and labor time before we plant or build anything.
  2. Document results: We take photographs, measure progress weekly, and track inputs such as amendments, irrigation schedules, and pest interventions. Failures are recorded alongside successes.
  3. Validate externally: Once we have on-the-ground data, we cross-reference extension publications, peer-reviewed research, and interviews with horticulture experts to confirm our findings or identify exceptions.
  4. Publish actionable steps: Guides are written with clear timelines, costs, and tool requirements so readers understand the full scope of the project before starting.
  5. Review on a schedule: We audit cornerstone guides at least twice per year and update them faster when unusual weather, supply-chain changes, or new pests alter the recommendations.

Research sources

We favor primary sources and regionally-relevant expertise:

  • Travis County Texas A&M AgriLife Extension and other land-grant university publications.
  • Peer-reviewed journals covering soil science, integrated pest management, and agroecology.
  • Field interviews with Master Gardeners, regenerative agriculture practitioners, and local farmers.
  • Government data sets including NOAA climate normals and USDA plant hardiness updates.
  • First-person grow logs contributed by readers that include photos and measurable data.

Corrections & updates

Accuracy matters. When readers surface an error or when new information invalidates a recommendation, we respond quickly:

  • Corrections are acknowledged in-line with a timestamp describing what changed and why.
  • Outdated strategies are archived and replaced with updated guidance rather than silently edited.
  • Major revisions are announced in the weekly newsletter so subscribers know to revisit core guides.
  • We maintain an internal changelog documenting every edit for accountability.

Product reviews & affiliate links

All product coverage is independent. Items are purchased at retail or provided under the condition that we may publish honest findings—even if those findings are negative. We disclose affiliate relationships at the top and bottom of relevant pages, and participation never guarantees a recommendation. Products that fail long-term testing are removed.

Diversity & inclusivity

Lawn conversion looks different in every neighborhood. We aim to represent diverse yards, budgets, and ability levels by highlighting adaptable techniques and accessible tool options. We welcome feedback on how to make our guides more inclusive.

Have a question about our standards?

Reach out at austin@smartlawnguide.com if you spot an inconsistency or want to understand a recommendation in more detail.